The condition of being “Mennonite” is not a stable condition; it is a site of contingencies, of ongoing conversation and new commitments, a realization that “Mennonites” have been experimenting with “post-Mennonite” identities.
– Paul Tiessen, “Postmodern Practice and Parody,” in Anabaptists and Postmodernity (Cascadia, 2000), 116.
On January 8th 2020 I presented a precis of my Mennonite Studies project at a scholar’s forum at the Toronto Mennonite Theological Centre. My talk was titled “Secular Mennonite Social Critique: Pluralism, Interdisciplinarity, and Mennonite Studies” and it summarized my wider research agenda in Mennonite Studies while surveying some of my published work. The presentation is now slated to be published in this book, and those who are interested should feel free to message me for a pre-print copy.
In short, my approach to re-conceptualizing Mennonite Studies focuses on interpretations of Mennonite texts and figures that depart from traditional theological and historical frames of reference. Rather than studying Mennonites at a distance by talking about them, and rather than seeking to preserve the tradition by speaking solely from within it, I attempt to think both with and against the Mennonite critique of violence by looking at minority figures within and around the tradition.
I focus on literary, political, philosophical, and secular Mennonite thinkers from a pluralistic and interdisciplinary perspective outlined below.
My work on Mennonite literature focuses on the artistic portrayal of community violence in works like Patrick Friesen’s The Shunning (in Literature and Theology in 2019), and the secular-feminist-Mennonite identities of literary figures like Miriam Toews (in Hamilton Arts & Letters in 2020).
My work on Mennonite Political Theology focuses on the dialogue between politically oriented Mennonite thinkers and feminist theologians (in the July 2019 issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review), and my editions of two pamphlets by politically engaged Mennonites also express the breadth of historical Mennonite engagement with political problems from racism to extremism.
I have also traced the history of philosophical Mennonites in my article on Mennonite Metaphysics (in the July 2017 issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review), and more recently in an updated entry for the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online (April 2020).
My work on secular Mennonites develops a distinctive approach to ‘secular Mennonite social critique,’ which I develop in my introduction to historian Robert Friedmann’s manuscript Design for Living (Wipf and Stock, 2017), in a recent update on the Anabaptist Historians blog (July 2020), and in my work on an early Anabaptist form of natural theology called “The Gospel of All Creatures” (in the 2019 issue of the Journal of Mennonite Studies).
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Mennonite Studies
In May 2021 my guest-edited special issue of Political Theology on “Mennonite Political Theology” published contributions from confessional, queer, secular, and feminist Mennonite scholars. These exciting contributions include:
• Maxwell Kennel, “Introduction: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Mennonite Political Theology.”
• Susanna Guenther Loewen, “The Personal is Political: The Politics of Liberation in Mennonite-Feminist Theologies.”
• Daniel Shank Cruz, “Mennonite Speculative Fiction as Political Theology.”
• Russell Johnson, “Building Peace in a Culture War: Christian Witness in a Polarized Society”